Evidence signed · Ed25519
EN ES
BC
BotConduct
An independent behavioral observatory
Vol. I · No. 5
Established 2026
Buenos Aires · LATAM

An independent observatory for receiver-side behavioral measurement of automated activity directed at the public web. Evidence, not enforcement.

— Filed by the Observatory Desk. Operated from Buenos Aires.
§ 01 · Latest research

Recent publications
from the Observatory Desk.

Research notes, behavioral briefings, and field reports issued by the Observatory. Findings are cryptographically signed and referenced against established frameworks.

Title · Abstract Filed by Reference
№ 14
Nine Documents, One Gap.How eight weeks in Spring 2026 made the AI agent observability problem empirical.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 12
Synthetic Contribution Overload.vLLM’s PR incident and the category that doesn’t have a name yet.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 11
The Second Standard.Why continuous internal audit anticipates but does not substitute for receiver-side attestation.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 10
When five years meet five days.On the architectural asymmetry of the AI-augmented adversary.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 09
The layer that reads what happened.Why behavioral attribution from the receiver side is becoming the missing reference of cyber-AI governance.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 08
When agents talk to agents.What Moltbook reveals about the receiver side.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 07
Behavioral Briefing May 2026.Monthly intelligence briefing.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 06
45% of adversarial traffic passes your WAF.Behavioral observation catches what identity-based systems miss.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →
№ 05
Agent role predicts adversarial resistance.What evaluation data shows about agent behavioral patterns.
Filed by BotConduct Observatory DeskMay 2026
Read →

The layer daybreak doesn't cover. On the operational layer that contemporary agent-defense frameworks do not yet describe — what happens after access is granted and before transaction.
Observatory DeskApr 2026
Read →

Seventeen days of reconnaissance, across twenty cloud providers. A single-property field report. The behavioral signature of a multi-jurisdiction reconnaissance operation transiting commercial cloud and consumer ISP infrastructure over seventeen calendar days.
Observatory DeskMar 2026
Read →
Six publications in print · Vol. I Browse full register →
§ 02 · Methodology

Independent classification.
Verifiable evidence.

The Observatory measures the conduct of automated actors from the receiving side of the public web. Each observation is recorded, characterized, and referenced against named frameworks. The classification is the product. The Observatory does not sell — and has no commercial interest in — the blocking, gating, or runtime tools whose business depends on that classification.

This separation is the source of the Observatory's authority. When the vendor that sells bot management is also the one classifying traffic, the vendor decides what counts as malicious — and that decision shapes their next renewal. The Observatory operates outside that circuit.

Findings are signed with Ed25519 and timestamped in an immutable evidence chain. Reports are verifiable independently of which WAF, CDN, or bot-management stack sits in front of the property. The evidence is intended to be independently verifiable without recourse to the Observatory.

Subject of observation
Automated actors directed at the public web — bots, scrapers, declared crawlers, AI crawlers, autonomous agents.
Point of measurement
Receiver-side. Instrumentation deployed downstream of perimeter defenses, at the property edge.
Form of evidence
Behavioral trajectories, cryptographically signed, referenced against framework controls.
Commercial position
The Observatory does not sell blocking, gating, or runtime defense.
Evidence is referenced against
NIST AI RMF
National Institute of Standards and Technology · Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework
OWASP Top 10 · Agentic
Open Worldwide Application Security Project · Top 10 for Agentic Applications
MITRE ATLAS
Adversarial Threat Landscape for Artificial Intelligence Systems
EU AI Act · Art. 15
European Union · Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity provisions
Colorado AI Act
SB 24-205 · Consumer protections for interactions with artificial intelligence systems
RFC 9309
IETF · Robots Exclusion Protocol, formalized
§ 03 · Engagements

Forms of engagement.
By appointment.

The Observatory accepts engagements selectively. All terms are quoted on request, after correspondence and review of fit. The Observatory does not operate a checkout surface.

№ 01 · Engagement

Site Behavioral Risk Assessment.

A forensic engagement on a single property. Receiver-side behavioral profiling of automated actors, with ASN attribution, threat-intelligence cross-reference, and full behavioral mapping. Evidence signed.

  • Single property · forensic depth
  • Signed evidence chain · Ed25519
  • Framework mapping included
Form · One-off engagement
Request a quote
№ 02 · Engagement

Continuous Behavioral Monitoring.

Sustained independent telemetry of bot and agent conduct against the property. Periodic signed reports, mapped to public bot registries and framework controls. Findings forensically usable as standalone evidence.

  • Periodic reporting · signed
  • Public registry mapping
  • Renewable by mutual review
Form · Ongoing engagement
Request a quote
№ 03 · Engagement

Enterprise · by introduction.

For organizations operating at scale. Custom scope and data-handling arrangements. By introduction only.

  • Custom scope · NDA
  • Custom jurisdictional arrangements
  • Signed evidence chain
Form · By introduction only
Submit a referral
§ 04 · About

Operated independently.
Observer-grade infrastructure.

BotConduct is an independent behavioral observatory. It measures the conduct of automated actors from the receiving site's perspective and produces diagnostic evidence. It is not a certification body. It does not certify products, brands, or counterparties.

Methodology is informed by, and consistent with, frameworks established in recent academic research — including DeepMind's "Practices for Governing Agentic AI Systems" (2024) and the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications — extended with empirical receiver-side observation across multiple jurisdictions and verticals.

Every observation is signed with Ed25519 and timestamped in an immutable evidence chain. Evidence is referenced against NIST AI RMF, OWASP Top 10 Agentic, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, and RFC 9309. The Observatory's working language is English; correspondence is also accepted in Spanish.

Operations

Operated from Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Data processing: EU-region infrastructure (Finland).
Working languages: English, Español.

Custom jurisdictional arrangements (US data residency, GDPR DPA, HIPAA, etc.) established per enterprise engagement during onboarding.

A note on public access

For property operators seeking receiver-side intelligence on a subscription basis, the Observatory operates a public access point under the WhoWatches mark — a curated cohort with monthly bulletins signed by the Desk. Enterprise engagements remain with BotConduct.

WhoWatches.io
§ 05 · Correspondence

Correspondence with
the Observatory Desk.

For engagement enquiries and correspondence. Replies are by the Desk, in writing, within five working days.

The Observatory accepts engagements by appointment.

Address correspondence to the Observatory Desk. Indicate jurisdiction, form of engagement, and a brief description of the matter under review. The Desk will respond, by name.

Address the Desk
Engagement · desk@botconduct.org