STATE OF BOT CONDUCT

April 2026

Published April 14, 2026 — First edition

This is the first State of Bot Conduct report. Over 3 days, we observed and tested 30 bots and AI agents using our behavioral scoring engine — a proprietary rubric that evaluates conduct under change across multiple behavioral dimensions.

Key Numbers

30
Bots scored
14
Operators identified
7
Official tests completed
57%
Score 70+ (acceptable)
30%
Score below 50 (hostile)
13%
Non-compliant (50-69)

Who Passed

Major search engines, social media crawlers, and AI agents demonstrated strong behavioral conduct. These bots identify themselves, respect site rules, and maintain reasonable request patterns.

Rating distribution for this reporting period is summarized qualitatively. Per-operator behavioral ratings are available to certified operators via API. Unauthenticated aggregate statistics at /api/registry.

Who Didn't

Several bots demonstrated behavioral patterns that fall below BCS standards. Common issues include missing identification, non-compliance with site rules, and aggressive access patterns.

Rating distribution for this reporting period is summarized qualitatively. Per-operator behavioral ratings are available to certified operators via API. Unauthenticated aggregate statistics at /api/registry.

AI Agents

AI agents are a growing presence on the web. In this report, we observed agents from OpenAI (ChatGPT-User, GPTBot) and ByteDance (Bytespider). All demonstrated responsible behavior in initial observations.

As AI agents take on more autonomous tasks — browsing, purchasing, filling forms, extracting data — behavioral certification becomes critical. Enterprise buyers need assurance that an agent won't cause damage. BCS provides that signal.

The gap is real.

57% of bots we observed meet acceptable behavioral standards. 30% are hostile. The difference isn't intelligence — it's conduct. BCS makes that difference measurable.

Methodology

Bots are evaluated through two methods: official tests (voluntary, 15 adversarial scenarios) and passive observation (automatic, based on real-world behavior on botconduct.org). Both methods score against the same proprietary rubric. Observed scores may be partial due to limited data.

This report does not disclose specific test scenarios or detection methods.

What's Next

The May 2026 report will include more bots, deeper analysis of AI agent behavior patterns, and the first renewal data from certified bots. We expect the registry to grow as more operators discover their bots are already being scored.

Test Your Bot or AI Agent

Aggregate API: /api/registry · Standard: BCS